PLC 914 ELD/SDAIE

Guidelines for Student Oral Language Observation Matrix (SOLOM)

 

Jill Kerper Mora
San Diego State University

 

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to provide an experience to student teachers in administering a rating scale for second language proficiency. The administration of the SOLOM to a student who is learning English as a second language will allow teacher candidates to observe the interaction between oral language proficiency termed Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills (BICS) and the cognitive academic skills (CALP) required for proficiency  in reading and writing. Analyses of this type inform teachers about how bilingual students' strengths and weaknesses in oral English interact in the four skills of language arts: listening, speaking, reading and writing. The SOLOM is designed to assess authentic oral language used for real, day-to-day classroom purposes and activities.

In addition, language assessment allows a teacher to closely observe students' development of different features of language proficiency in a holistic fashion. This information is useful in planning appropriate instruction for bilingual readers and writers. The skills you will acquire in completing this assignment address RICA content area 13: Structure of the English language. For a complete discussion of the purpose and structure of the SOLOM and how it is scored, see your textbook, Peregoy & Boyle (1997), p. 122-128. The SOLOM rating scale is on p. 124-5.

Administrating the SOLOM

Choose a student from your classroom who is classified as an English language learner. Observe the student in several different authentic classroom activities in which he/she is interacting with the teacher and/or classmates, such as cooperative group task. Observe for a minimum of five minutes on each occasion. On each occasion, mark the rankings on the matrix according to your impressions of the child's use of English.

You may wish to audio record one or more of your sessions to go back and confirm your impressions or to look for certain patterns of errors or usage. You will rate the child's language use on a scale from 1 to 5 on each of these traits: comprehension, fluency, vocabulary, pronunciation, and grammar. Cross-check your ratings from the different contexts in which you observed the child for consistencies or variations that may indicate different levels of proficiency according to language function or purpose.

Scoring the SOLOM

The SOLOM yields ratings for four phases of English language proficiency.

Arrwbullet.gif (359 bytes)Phase 1 = 5-11

Arrwbullet.gif (359 bytes)Phase 2 = 12-18

Arrwbullet.gif (359 bytes)Phase 3 = 19-24

Arrwbullet.gif (359 bytes)Phase 4 = 25 Full English proficiency

Reporting the SOLOM Results

You will submit a brief report of the results of the SOLOM to include the following information:

redcheck.gif (250 bytes)The child's total score and phase of English language acquisition.

redcheck.gif (250 bytes)A discussion of the child's strengths and weaknesses in the five traits.

redcheck.gif (250 bytes)A brief description of the classroom context and activity or activities in which you observed the child.

redcheck.gif (250 bytes)Overall impressions of the child's ability to function in English in an academic context as well as a social interaction context.

redcheck.gif (250 bytes)A discussion of what insights you gained from the experience of administering the rating scale. These could include addressing issues such as:

dotpurpl.gif (252 bytes)Did the child's level of overall fluency allow him/her to participate fully in academic activities or was his/her participation impaired?

dotpurpl.gif (252 bytes)Did you note a marked difference between the child's performance in social settings within the classroom versus his/her performance on academic tasks?

dotpurpl.gif (252 bytes)Was the child's command of vocabulary adequate for him/her to gain "comprehensible input" from academic instruction?

dotpurpl.gif (252 bytes)Did the child's pronunciation and/or grammar usage impede others' abilities to comprehend the child? If so, did this occur occasionally or frequently?

dotpurpl.gif (252 bytes)What modifications in instruction and or interpersonal communications did you observe for this child? Would you recommend different or additional accommodations based on this analysis?

Additional Resources

You may also consult your PLC 194 reader for some helpful information about language proficiency ratings. On p. G 15-18 there is a more detailed rating scale used by the Foreign Service Institute for holistic ratings and also for rating each component of language.

Turning in the Assignment

This assignment is due on December 8, 1999. You may e-mail your SOLOM report to <jmora@mail.sdsu.edu> or turn it in to the PDS mailbox in the workroom at Rosa Parks School.

To navigate Dr. Mora's CLAD Website:

 

Return to 
Dr. Mora's Home Page

  MoraModules Index

Go to PLC 914 Syllabus

Go to ED 516 Syllabus

TE 638 ESL Strategies Syllabus

4X4 Activities & Strategies

Language Assessment Module

Go to a Model 4X4 Unit

Dr. Mora's Bulletin Board

RICA Study Guide

 

This page was last updated on 11/17/99