Language Assessment

What It Measures and How

 

Jill Kerper Mora, Ed.D.
San Diego State University


7/25/98

Click here to start

Table of Contents

Language Assessment: What it measures and how

Dimensions of L2 Fluency Talking 

Dimensions of L2 Fluency Vocabulary & Syntax

Dimensions of L2 Fluency Knowing the Rules

Dimensions of L2 Fluency Creativity with Language

Measuring Fluency Instruments

Commercial Assessment Instruments

The Observation Matrix (Solom)

Uses of Language Assessment

Sytematic Errors

Transfer Errors

Overgeneralization

Avoidance Errors

Idiomatic Errors

Idiosyncratic Errors

Author: Jill Kerper Mora
Copyright 1998

E-mail Dr. Mora 
with your comments
 
 


Return to Dr. Mora's Home Page
 

 


To MoraModules Menu

Source

Fillmore, C.J. (1979). On fluency. In C.J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, & W. S-Y Wang, (Eds.) Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior, pp. 85-101. New York:
Academic Press.


 

 

 

Additional On-line Resources about Language Assessment on Dr. Mora's CLAD Website

 

Click here for Dr. Mora's analysis of the 2003-04 CELDT data and the LAO's 2004 report on progress on the CELDT

Click here for Dr. Mora's analysis of the Reclassification Debate

Click here for Dr. Mora's testimony on assessment of LEP students before the National Assessment Governing Board (1998). 

Click here for a description of procedures for administering the Student Oral Language Observation Matrix.

Click here for a description of a language assessment case study assignment using the Primary Acquisition of Languages (PAL) instrument
 

LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT: Myths & Reality

Jill Kerper Mora

1. Language assessment is based on theories and principles of language structures and language learning and/or acquisition.

2. Language assessment instruments are limited by the validity and reliability of the theoretical models on which they are designed.

3. Language assessment can be undertaken for descriptive and/or diagnostic purposes. Not all instruments are valid for both purposes.

4. Language assessment instruments are limited by the practical aspects of test administration and scoring.

5. Few language assessment instruments evaluate both the Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills (BICS) and the Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency (CALP) simultaneously. Most instruments only assess BICS with any level of reliability and validity.

6. Educators must not rely on a single instrument to make program placements or entry/exit decisions for students who are bilingual/L2 learners.

7. It is important to have language assessment data in the student’s primary language. Much information can be gained by comparing proficiency levels in L1 and L2.

8. Language assessment can be global or holistic in nature, or based on discrete points of language such as grammar or vocabulary.

 

 

This page was last updated on 07/19/07