Bloom's learning domains
DURING THE 1950'S, BENJAMIN BLOOM LED a team of educational psychologists in the analysis of academic learning behaviors. The results of this team's research produced what is known today in the field of education, as Bloom's Taxonomy. This hierarchy of learning behaviors was categorized into three interrelated and overlapping learning domains; the cognitive (knowledge), affective (attitude), and psychomotor (skills). (Lane, 2001) This article describes in detail each of these three learning domains.
The Cognitive Domain
The Cognitive Learning Domain is exhibited by a person's intellectual abilities. Cognitive learning behaviors are characterized by observable and unobservable skills such as comprehending information, organizing ideas, and evaluating information and actions.
![]() |
Evaluation | judges the value of information |
| Synthesis | builds a pattern from diverse elements | |
| Analysis | separates information into part for better understanding | |
| Application | applying knowledge to a new situation | |
| Comprehension | understanding information | |
| Knowledge | recall of data |
Cognitive learning level: Application.
These skills are arranged into six hierarchical levels, beginning from the simple and building to the most difficult. These six categories are arranged on scale of difficulty, meaning that a learner who is able to perform at the higher levels of the taxonomy, is demonstrating a more complex level of cognitive thinking.
In this picture, the learner is applying his knowledge of mathematical computation to solve a multiple step word problem.
A Detailed Explaination of Bloom's Cognitive Taxonomy
The Affective Domain
The Affective Learning Domain addresses a learner's emotions towards learning experiences. A learner's attitudes, interest, attention, awareness, and values are demonstrated by affective behaviors.
These emotional behaviors which are organized in a hierarchical format also, starting from simplest and building to most complex, are as follows:
![]() |
Internalizing Values | behavior which is controlled by a value system |
| Organization | organizing values into order of priority | |
| Valuing | the value a person attaches to something | |
| Responding to phenomena | taking an active part in learning; participating | |
| Receiving phenomena | an awareness; willingness to listen |
These five categories can be thought of in a scaffolding manner, one must be learned in order to move onto the next category. (Clark, 1999)
Affective learning Level: Valuing
In the picture to the left, this learner is writing a praise note in response to another child's positive actions.
The Psychomotor Domain
The psychomotor domain refers to the use of basic motor skills, coodination,and physical movement. Bloom's research group did not develop in-depth categories of this domain, claiming lack of experience in teaching these skills. However, Simpson (1972) developed seven psychomotor categories to support Bloom's domain.
|
|
Origination | a learner's ability to create new movement patterns |
| Adaptation | a learner's ability to modify motor skills to fit a new situation | |
| Complex Overt Response | the intermediate stage of learning a complex skill | |
Mechanism |
the ability to perform a complex motor skill | |
| Guided Response | the early stage of learning a complex skill which includes imitation | |
| Set | a learner's readiness to act | |
| Perception | the ability to use sensory cues to guide physical activity |
Psychomotor learning level: Mechanism
These physical behaviors are learned through repetitive practice. A learner's ability to perform these skills is based on precision, speed, distance, and technique. (Clark, 1999).
This child is demonstrating a behavior from the psychomotor domain. While practicing the physical movements in throwing a softball he is learning and improving this skill through repetitive practice.
More information
http://officeport.com/edu/blooms.htm
Jennifer Martin, graduate student
SDSU Educational Technology
Martin, J. (2001). Bloom's learning domains. In B. Hoffman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. Retrieved from
